Flames!
Flames
I've been waiting and waiting and it finally happened! I Review got flamed! Yes, not exactly something to be, erm, proud of, but since we are straight forward (no sugar here!) I'm surprised we didn't get one sooner. The use of yellow is kinda painful in this section, sorry,  but at least it isn't red!
If you or someone you know wishes to flame us, our e-mails can be found in the About Us section.

*    *    *

I know you're going to just either a) ignore this or b) twist my words around to make me sound stupid, but I want to write this anyway.
Ignore a flame? Never! Responding is too much fun.
You say you don't sugarcoat yourself? All the big, "popular" sites
why is popular in quotation marks? A site is popular or it isn't.
you reviewed got perfect, all the less popular ones you ripped on. Why?
Like Jadeite said, the reason a site is popular is that it's GOOD. It's hard to tell a really good site like Starlight Pops that it needs to change things when the site is already amazing. However, a site that sucks is of course not going to be popular. So we tell it what needs to be done. Secondly, you are confused as to what sugarcoating is. It means that a WPR will say "your layout need improvement" versus "your layout's neon green blinds me". Sugarcoating has nothing to do with popularity.
Why do you feel the need to kiss up to some sites? Some sites DO suck, but don't claim to not sugarcoat a million times and then kiss ass to the "big" sites.
Again with the quotes..were you awake in English class that day? Anyway, I don't suck up. If I say I love a site or say it's amazing, it's because that's what I think about it. Sucking up would be if I said that but didn't mean it. You'd think Flaffy would be familiar enough with IR's honesty policy to know that I'm not going to say I like something id I don't like it.
Please. It's been done before, it's not new or cool.
So? Are you saying I tell a webmisstress I like her work to be cool? damn, do me a favour and never visit an art gallery.
Ooh, you're going to say "fuck" a couple times and refer to Nazis, you're such a badass.
Fuck is a perfectly normal word. I'm not saying it be a badass, it's just a word. The referance to Nazis was made by some other flamer.
Actually, you're an idiot. Thank you for the brilliant observation.
If you're going to pretend not to sugarcoat, and to be straight-forward, you might as well tell your actual opinion rather than basing your reviews in order of hierarchy.
Gods, have you actually read any of our reviews? Y'know I've been at this for over a year. It's pretty hard to fake something for that long. What you read in my reviews is my opinion. I can't possibily sit at my computer and think "hmm what can I say that will make me look cool?" Never once have I thought "gee, if I compliment this owner, I'll be liked!" sheesh. One more thing. In case you didn't notice, there is NO hierchy in our reviews. We don't have grades or percents or good/bad sections. Our reviews are based on nothing more than the site seen before us, not how many hits it has.
I know you're going to come up with the lame-ass overused excuse that "You don't have a website, don't judge mine". *rolls eyes* I used to have one, but I realized it's not worth it. And I don't have to have a website to form an opinion on one.
uhm, actually I couldn't care less whether you have a site or not. An opinion from someone with a site is just as valid as from someone who doesn't. *shrugs*
This isn't a flame; it's an opinion.
Actually, all flames are opinions. Your opinion just happens to be that we suck. You seem really hung up on us giving praise to good sites. Wouldn't you hate us more if we bitched at great sites just to keep up our reputation? Now THAT would be hypocracy.
I actually used spellcheck, didn't write in caps, and left an email address. And I hope you realize that doing that stuff doesn't make you any smarter or better than the people who don't.
Thank you for hearing out my opinion. You're welcome.
-Flaffy

*    *    *

ARGH! You wouldn't believe how long it took me to do the colours on this one.. The Flamer's comments are in purple, while everyone else has their normal colour. If you don't know who is who, go to the About Us section.

Welcome to Animal Planet. In today's episode we travel to the distant land of 'duhm-ahs'. We are luckily enough to come across this drooling specimen:
Name: rei
Cute, it's all lowercase.
Where did you find the link to IR? up me ass
When have discovered this new species we had no idea of it's fascination with inspecting or picking at it's bottom. Really quite disgusting. (wow, really?! I mean, i know our link gets around, but THERE? jebus.)
Must have been a tight fit. There's nine of us in total.
Good mate, while you do that, I'll put some steak on the barbie.
Oi. What did you do? Stick your hand up there and grab it?
That is so disgusting! Why would you be digging up there in the first place? But I'm not one to ask what people do behind closed doors, so we'll leave that one alone. FREAK!
Do you know the URL of a free layouts site? u tryen to cheat?
With the aid of a team of linguists we were able to determine that no, this is not the following languages: 'Pig British', 'Trailer Trash Lingo' nor 'Crack Ho'. After swallowing mass quantaties of b34r I decifered it to mean "You trying to cheat?" or in a proper English question, "Are you trying to cheat?". The answer is: cheat what? oh my god, is this a test? Using pre-made layouts is not 'cheating'. The stupidity of that question..
Who says anything about cheating? Spending hours on a layout can be fun but really, we do have reviews to do :P Oh yeah, rei? learn to spell.
u tryen to spell?
No..We are trying to review.
Why do you care what we do anyways? You're the one who pulls things out of their ass... crazy wierdo.
What'chu gots to say? okay well is this site called nightmare cause that fits it perfectly. ahaha.
Once again you'll notice the lack of intelligence in this specimen, as a questions is implied and yet there is no question mark. Yet more evidence is the fact that the site in question's title is I Review, which was in capitals and bolded on the main page, as well as being in the title tags.
Hmm? What's this about then? Oi, Fishies, I don't get it. *big ass stupid grin*
Amused by your own self? How sad, and no, this site is called I Review, learn to spell, then learn to read.
It's called "I Review" You dumbass. READ.
yes... you submit your site,we review it...for some it may be a nightmare.
well when i entered this site an error poped up i thought it was a one time thing (thats ok) but i went to other parts of the site & well well well it poped up every god damn time!!!
Apparently this specimen has a fondness for the word 'well', perhaps it offers a degree of comfort in unknown terroroty. The high intelligence factor of I Review's inhabitants has no doubt made the specimen uncomfortable. (Actually, I haven't seen that error before. No one else has reported an error. If this person had e-mailed me about it I would have appoligized.)
I thought I told you to learn how to spell. So you get errors. Maybe your computer settings are funny. I've never gotten errors.
That would be Tripod's fault my dear.
time to get your computer checked. Probably have a virus.
ever thought it might be your shitty computer? I can view it just fine!
for ppl who say they know HTML this site's layout sux.
Ahaha, *scientist adjusts glasses* I have used my handy "duhm-ahs" dictionary to decifer that phrase. Once more it can be used as proof that this specimen is dumber than a captivity-born monkey on Xenotonin: Fisheye has never claimed to know HTML, and has in fact on SEVERAL occasions mentioned that she knows barely any HTML. Also, the layout has no relevance on Fisheye's HTML skills, as she did not made this layout.
First off, Fishuu-chan, how well do you know HTML? I do believe you tell everyone in the About Us that you've been using Trellix Web for the majority of it. Besides, Nightmare is a pre-designed layout. Fishuu-chan doesn't work on it. Besides, she doesn't like it when us HTML gurus bug her about us doing the layouts.
We never claim to know HTML. As a matter of fact, Fisheye states repeatedly that she has no clue what she is doing. And the rest of us never say whether we do or not... so looks like you pulled that out of your ass too, huh buddy?
First off, this isn't our layout. Second, it is a great layout and shows good html skills, which Fisheye here had to learn.
whats up w/ all the space at the right side of the page? you should fill it okay?
Okay. What ever keeps you happy. *patonthehead* have a Lollipop.
With what? It's a blog style layout, moron. I know lots of websites that use the same style, big blank spaces are common. Go to a few design sites and what not, and have a look, deary.
What's up with you flaming us? And your horrible slang and grammar?
Okay, if we did fill that space, your attention would be averted from the webpages actual content. Please, I don't see you being ms.HTML princess myself, and with a comment like that, you must know nothing about HTML, or proportion, or anything. School is cool.
your reveiws r rude
:smiles: Thank you! That is a compliment. My goal in life is to be as rude as humanly possible
And your point is...?
COME ON THESE R REVEIWS! NOT FLAMES!!!! TEL THE PPL WHATS WRONG KINDLY AND TELL THEM HOW TO FIX IT OKAY!?
Once more we have agreed that the repetition of words is a comfort mechanism. The following has been debated however, two out of five scientist believe the ommision of certain letters of the alphabet is a linguistic sacrifice to the God known as "eedeeoots". Three out of five Animal Planet observers think it's 'gay in the high school sense of the word' and yet another sign of intelligence rivalling that of a turkey.
Ah, you must be new to I Review. I do believe we have stated, a hundred times over, that we don't sugar coat, and if you want help, then go to a place that does help. Not us. We review what we think of the website-- what we think of websites as we come across them online. Feh, why be sweet and sugary and sappy when I can say what I've told webmasters in emails before? I just get to say it so people can read it now. *grins wickedly* Besides, if you hadn't noticed, the majority of us are named after villians. Villains aint nice.
Um sorry, we don't sugar coat here. We are not here to please you with reviews to your liking.
If you read in our about section we state that we are not here to help. This is all for a good time. For us anyways. If you actually read though the site, you most likely wouldn't of wrote any of this, would you?
i read a lot of ur reveiws you shouldnt tell ppl their sites a load of crap dont be hypocritical okay?
Ahah, the question of honesty arises. If a site is crap, should not the IR team state thusly? (Hypocracy is almost unavoidable, as what I'm commenting on usually is an IDEAL of what a site could be.)
hmm... look who's being hypocritical now? You say not to flame, and yet here you are, flaming us away.
Sorry, we speak the truth. Their site probbaly is a load of crap.
geez im could be a better reveiwer & ive got no expericence....
*scientist scribbles on notepad* Here is evidence as to the specimen's misplaced ego. Everyone thinks they can do a great job because everything YOU do is right. Think about it, it's one of the principles of reviewing. So you want to be a reviewer, eh? Well, you don't know how much you suck at something 'til you try.
It's I could be a better reviewer, not im could be a better reveiwer. That right there throws off your whole point there, ass. Number two, who cares what you could do? You're not doing it, so you can't say anything because you know nothing about us or the way we review.
Gee that says a lot. I bet you would be one of those shitty, sugar coated reviewers.
Now, Tiger's eye has gone to her trusty dictionary, here is the definition to review; to examine with an eye to criticism or correction. To write or give a critical report on (a new work or performance, for example). Now, no where does this say that a review has to be correctional. It can be though, our's just happen to not. Oh, you could use one of these nifty inventions yourself my dear, it's hard to understand what you're saying.
so u should all go to hell for saying terrible things to these ppl fuck off & die nazi punks.
*Fisheye waves bye-bye to helpful scientist* First-Hell is not real, and a stupid place to send a reviewer. *whine* Mommy, she doesn't like my website! Oh, well, I should just fry for enternity then. riiight. Second-kiss my ass. Third-Equating a group of silly bitchy reviewers and the NAZI party is..gee, can you even conceive of your own stupidity? on one hand we have: us saying we don't like your layout & you need more content VS the death of over six million people. -.- Fourth-Punks have nothing to do with Nazis. One is a group of pissed off individuals sick of the status quo who belive in the anarchy theory; that people can be good without outside interfearance from government. Can you figure out which group that is, or was that a little too hard for your tiny mind?
Hey Fish, we ever tell a site that wasn't crap that it was crap? I do believe we've made a number of sites better places because we tell them like it is. Not what a site wants to hear "Oh, it's so pretty, I just love the overdose of pink, can we have more?" Gag me with a butcher knife. If I don't like something, you know about it upfront, and you fix it if everyone on the team doesn't like it. If it's just me, you just go, "Oh it's just Aian. Ignore her".
Hey hey, watch which punks you call nazis. *sniffs* This punk don't do the kill six million jews shit. Thank-you-very-much. She does the kill flamers-who-don't-read-what-is-written-in-plain-sight thing. Ta-ta for now, dear-heart. *snickers*
Fish eye, since when did we turn into nazi's? Next week can we swashbucklers?
Thank you so much for the lovely comments. If we go to hell, we will make sure to save your poorly educated ass a seat. Have a great day!
I'm not going to dignify this with a very long response. But, a response it will get nonetheless.
So, let me get this straight. You mean to tell me that, if you're to correct someone, you are to do it politely and gently. Alright, an acceptable opinion. "so u should all go to hell for saying terrible things to these ppl fuck off & die nazi punks."
So, everyone except YOU, apparently, has to hold to these standards. Ah, now I understand. You're stupid! It ALL makes sense now!
Look, if you're going to set a standard, set a standard. Reviews are a matter of opinion, and if you've got a problem with the style, you have every right to do so. But if you're going to have a problem with people being harsh, genius, take a tiny little look at the way you voice it.
Yes, Madam Pot, I, The Kettle, am black. Yourself?
Oh my, someone has a potty mouth! Oh look! I can too! You need to fuck off ass packer! 0.o What in the hell is the deal with the nazi punks? Do you see any little Hitlers running around on our site? Do we support the nazi movement? Are we secretly planning to revive the nazi party? Nooooooooo.... you need to just crawl back into your little hole called your ass and leave your remarks crammed up there with you! ~ Love, Diana

*    *    *
I wouldn't call this a flame, but I had to respond somewhere so here it is.
Lily: venusbeauty33@aol.com
Your layout is annoying, it changes with each review, totally unorganized, and the banners are a bitch. I like your reviews though... but you really need a better, more consistant layout if you're going to talk to other people about theirs.
yes, banners are annoying. care to give me money to get rid of them? no? then shut up.
well OF COURSE the layout changes every month. I get bored of it! I love seeing new layouts on other sites. It's like clothes, why the hell would I wear the same outfit every day? Having the same layout all the time would be horribly boring.
Unorganized? what the hell? Do explain that one to me because as I see it everything has it's proper place.
Also, I've been talking to people about their layout while IR sported much crappier layouts than this. Heck, this is probably the 'best' layout IR has had since I didn't make it!
I have the feeling that you are one of those idiots that thinks a pretty package is more important as content. The layout is no where near as important as our reviews. So I'm pleased you like our reviews, since that is what matters.
hey, want to work for me? you sound like a reviewer. XD
p.s. I think your site's layout is ugly too.
This is the respose I got in the mail:
 Hey
I think you misunderstood... first I know you can't help the banners, sorry, but they are like a bitch. And moving to a free host with less than two banners is not for the lazy, neh? Second, you don't convert new layouts to the reviews, so it looks sloppy (and I'm wrong for using unorganized, I meant sloppy. Sloppiness looks unorganized to me).
I agree, new layouts are an advantage, but if you change your layout, you should change all (stressed on the "all") pages. I get annoyed at that easily because it sometimes means laziness.
I never said your layout was ugly. I guess my wording can confuse people... I write what I'm thinking, and I don't think about how other people will interpret it. I like your layout, but I didn't like how it changes when I click on a review. If it's too much work for you then fine... don't answer me telling me that, I can figure that out myself.
Yeah, layouts are not as important, but thanks for stressing on my layout (on my site) instead of what's on it.
See ya. P.S. You called me an idiot, then asked me to be a reviewer, hehe. Joke? I couldn't tell, but that's funny.

banners: no, actually, i can't move. when i publish using trellix web i have three options. one is fortunecity which has MORE ads, and the other one is paid. so tripod is my only option. and i LIKE tripod.
I am not going to stop using trellix because HTML takes too long and I don't know enough about it. Sure, think me lazy if you want. If I see an easy way to do something, why would I do it the hard way? People ask for reviews by IR whether our layout is something I put out or whether it's a masterpiece of HTML.
I am never going to change all the pages. I have about 100 pages of past reviews. The reviews do have their own kind of layout that works with the main page's scheme, such as the Badiaynu theme and the bright trippy venus/artemis theme. The main page layout the reviews layout will never looks the same because I need more space to write on the reviews pages.
I really don't care that you are annoyed by my pages. It's a paltry little detail. As long as you read what we say, that's what matters.
I commented on your layout because you were commenting on mine. I'm not going to waste my time perusing yet another dull dragonball site. I don't like that show one bit, so why read about it? Assuming that's what your site was about, with all that yellow and blue. Yes, it is a joke. You're not even reading the same book as me, let alone being on the same page.
-Fisheye


*    *    *


amanda_rich63@hotmail.com
Hello I Review! Hello flamer!

I can't believe you can call yourself a WPR! what else would we call ourselves? we review web pages, therefore we are a team of web page reviewers. duh.
I mean you just FLAME everyone that submits to you! I've consulted a team of experts, and there are a few components to a flame. 1) there must be ill-intent. Our reviews don't have that, we review for fun and help.
2) flames are sent by idiots who overuse the caps button. IR does not do that.
3) flames are not asked for, unlike our reviews.
HOW RUDE ARE YOU GUYS? pretty damn rude, thanks for asking. but not so rude as to flame someone.
CAN'T YOU GIVE A DECENT REVIEW ONE once IN YOUR LIVES? not only have we given many decent reviews, but a few outstanding, commemorable, historic and even amusing reviews.
HOW CAN YOU EVEN CALL YOURSELF A WPR WHEN YOU CANT EVEN MAKE A LAYOUT! Look! There is a BOTTOM scroll bar! What an Idiot! LEARN HOW TO MAKE A LAYOUT!
yup, i gotta agree with ya there. March's layout is the worst layout in IR's history. I couldn't wait for the month to be over to replace. Do look at our new layout, it's much better.
We can. If you've bothered to visit personal pages, we can.
WONDER WHY YOU GET SO MANY FLAMES? because there are a lot of oversensitive idiots reading IR? because people would rather blame us for their failures than go and fix them? because IR has such fun responding? BECAUSE YOU GUYS SUCK! *slurp*
WHY DON'T YOU GET HOSTED? we are not hosted for the oh-so-simple fact that I don't want to be hosted. I've never had the desire, and it does not change IR in any way to be hosted, except to add more hassle to my updating procedure. I have not asked anyone to host us, nor will I ever. I KNOW WHY! and how, pray tell, do you have this arcane knowledge of my thoughts? NO ONE WILL HOST YOUR SORRY-ASSES! my ass isn't sorry. what does my ass have to be sorry about? *looks around* is anyone else's ass sorry?
'Fisheye uses her patented Fissuu Throwing Knives (TM) to pick what we review' Fisheye (moi) receives the submits. sometimes i get people who either don't understand or didn't read the rules. i reject those. thus, i pick what we review. i am also responsible for the change from shrines only to themes only, thus i again pick what we review. WHAT IF THEY DON'T WANT THERE SITE REVIEWED? YOU JUST CAN'T PICK OUT A SITE AND REVIEW IT! I don't. If i did that, i wouldn't have a submit form now would i?
I swere swear this is the WORST WPR, if you can call it that, on the NET! *shrugs* call us what you will. do you think I care?
Well I hope your wpr goes to hell! WPRs can go to hell?! *looks up* God? I don't remember there being anything about reviewing in the bible, care to explain? Wow. I'm sure the pixels will suffer terribly there. I can just picture the text files roasting in eternal torment now.
Amanda
^_^ This is so funny!

Hullo Amanda. I flame when I'm in a pissy mood. I say that right in my reviews. Other than that, I don't see any flaming done. I critique sites the way I see fit-- if I don't like a site, I tell you, I don't sugar coat it, love. *snorts* Fishuu's layouts are nice, because they are simple. And because I'm not the one making it. I've got enough problems with my own websites. As for hosting... Feh, why move? Tripod is free, to get a domain name would mean having to pay money for something we do for fun. Now why would we do that? *blinks* Hey guys, how many flames have we gotten? I don't recall there being all that many. As for the throwing knives thing-- don't you know when someone is kidding around? Sheesh, try to have a sense of humor, and someone decides that deserves to be flamed. *smirks* I suppose I'll have to take I Review down to hell when I go to visit the Hallunciantion of God, in Chrisworld-- to get there, you just take a left at hell, then go down a bit further. You should visit sometime, maybe your flames could be used to light the lanterns? Love you, Aian.

Thank you for your comment. Unfortunatly, what you call falming is actually called crtiquing. You see we do give decent reviews, to sites we deem to be recent. If you look back, we recently reviewed Starlight Pops and Moon Fantasy who recieved rather praisful reviews if I am not mistaken. I know that in all my reviews, I ALWAYS support my comments (that is partially why my reviews are so lengthy). About the layout, we (as a group) don't make the layouts, Fishy does and frankly she doesn't claim to be a webgraphic artist. I may comment on graphics, but I have a webgraphic experience with such programs as Fireworks, PSP, Photoshop and etc. so therefore it is appropriate for me to comment on such (if you wish to prove me wrong please relpy). Also, I do not see a bottom scrollbar. Also, why would we want to be hosted? Unfortunatly, most of the animre related domains are hosted by pretentious (sad, but true) teen girls who believe they are master webauthors and do not understand a tithe of the Javascript, which they use abundently. Have you considered that we stay on tripod b/c we enjoy it the benefits of their service? If our 'asses' are so sorry, why do you waste time flaming us? Also, all of our reviews are submitted, if you had spent time to browse our site instead of making blind accusations, you would have noticed we have a submit form. Do you really think we meet to have parties to throw knives? And frankly I'd rather be in hell than heaven, for as Voltaire said, upon being asked to repent while on his deathbead, "Now is a very bad time to be making enemies". Oh yeah, I am not Christian so guess I have nothing to fear. See, we're, not that rude? We sit down and explain everything when asked without the repetitve use of caps which you seem to be fond of.
Have a charming day.
Kao.
P.S. Please submit for a review if you think your site is far superior to anything we have seen yet.




*    *    *

wingedavalon@hotmail.com
Thank you for reviewing my website: Sailormoon Says. I really appreciate it. I have learned about many mistakes that are entirely my fault at large and some that are just tiny meaningless mishaps. You're welcome. Just doing mah job.Your review pointed out many faults that I am currently changing, and you have also pointed out some of your "dislikes" that could be modified somewhat. The reason for not putting up a link to your site honestly was because I had forgotten about even submitting my site for a review since it was a long time before I heard from you that you received my submittion. Yeah, that's happened before, which is why we remind you in our reviews. Anyways, back to the review. I would just like to make a few comments about your review if you don't mind. Comments are always welcomed.

...Starting with Fisheye's portion of the review, I think the title was original to me. I thought of the idea and I have never come across a site that uses it in my many searches of interesting Sailormoon info. I've seen it before, I've seen the concept before too, although just as a section of a larger site.

...In Ironmouse's review I found that the review was a little rude and demanding. I know that some of my material on the website wasn't extremely funny but no one that I know of told me that I absolutely HAD to make YOU laugh. If it ain't funny to me, it ain't funny. And, Amy-dear? Your site said "funniest things said in the Sialormoon Dub". You could have put the entire english opening theme in there, and I would have laughed my head off. Those are some of the stupidest lines I've ever heard. Oh yeah, I'm pretty sure when you put down "funniest..." anything, it's supposed to make people laugh. T'aint that right, Fishuu? right.
I asked for a review of my site, not a physcological analysis of it. Same difference. Anything goes in a review here. Psychological anaylsis? I didn't do that! I could if you want. Which system do you want me to use? Psychoanalytic? Humantistic? Behaviourism? There are a lot more. Believe me, if I was doing a psychological analysis of you, you'd KNOW it.And I re-read my review. It's not that bad. I explained why I didn't like everything. I explained why I didn't really find much of it funny. So you think my natural behaviourisms are... "rude and demanding". *smirk* I suppose it's better than "Overly cheerful, smiles to damned much, and TALKS to damned much".
And I'm sorry if my website isn't about the Japanese since of I live in Canada, Aianmausu. Both you and I needn't apologize for that. ?? "Amy ^_^", living in Canada is NO excuse for anything. Wanna know where I live? Calgary, Alberta. CANADA. *sarcastically* and I'm so~ sorry if I hurt your feelings. I try not to do that to people, but sometimes, people are in a bad mood. Especially when they have final exams, working on a project for SAIT (Southern Alberta Institute of Technology, in case you didn't know), have work on my kata's because sensei has decided it's time to grade me for my next belt, AND work on my chords for guitar, because quite frankly, I suck. Try doing a (two!) review(s) with all that piled on ya. I think I did fairly well at not being overly "rude and demanding" with all that shit piled on me.

...Kaolinite tells about the grammer and "satisfactory" of the website although some of it is not for her to judge on. She can judge on whatever she wants. Well I would feel that my job is not complete if I did not respond to this comment. First of all with the "although some of it is not for her to judge ". Sorry my dear I review. That's why I am on this WPR. I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't review the complete site.
For example, she rants on about how her resolution is 1024x768 and how the background repeats itself. That's really nice to know except I have a 800x600 resolution and I made my website to fit that criteria. A LOT of sites fit both sizes, and they are better sites for it.
That's YOUR problem. I'm sorry but I cannot make a website that "fits all". It's a waste of my time. No, actually, if you cared at all for your audience you would have it fill all resolutions. It is obviously YOUR problem to deal with since Kao can't change the size of your site's layout. What I was trying to get at with the stint about the resolution was that you should extend the picture so that it works on all resolutions (Hey I don't make sites for 1024 x 768 just because it makes me happy; the nature of your site is to enterain viewes, and likewise cater to their needs). This does not take much time to do, all you have to do is extend a picture...get over it or how about *gasp* making your own graphics!
Grammar I can fix, I have no problem with that. I am glad that you have decided to cheack your grammer and I admit even I mess up with spelling and incorrect grammer usage too.
And the fact that when you hover over links and it changes colour to white is what I wanted it to do. You would obviously know what it says before you go to click on it, so what's the big deal? Maybe you think it's cool to use hover effects that make your links unreadable, but sometimes I randomly hover my mouse over a link and forget what it says, not to mention the links are rather small and hard to read. This was only a minor detail and I do not see why you are so offended by it. If you cannot take constructive criticism then please do not submit for reviews (I would assume that you know that I Review does not sugar-coat our reviews).
It's not breaking any laws. *laughs her ass off* By using copyrighted material, i.e. sailor moon scripts and images, you are breaking the law.

I also didn't ask for a review about other anime television shows nor did I want a clarification on whether I was mature or not to watch any other these such shows. You're a picky one aren't cha? how's this, next time, you tell us what we can and can't review. Okay about the mature thing I was rereading my review and see that I accidentally typed rather instead of rated. What I meant was that SM would have a Ma rating and would not be aired on primetime so I think we should count it as a blessing that it is edited and still allowed to air.

I honestly think I was wasting my time reading this portion of my review which was so totally expanded to include rude opinions which could have been kept to one's self. How many times do I have to explain this? A review is nothing but opinion. Of course it's going to include rude stuff!
Also, my special section includes my opinions. Opinions which do not have to be reviewed since they are not Sailormoon material. Once again, my job is to review the whole site, also, your opinons actually have SM relavent material.They were generated by me. I also don't care if other people have the same opinions. If you would like me to I would gladly get rid of that section if it bothers you so much. The only reason I go to sites is for opinion. We review the whole site, not just bits of it. sheesh! About me including other animes, you were the one in your rant who brought up DBZ so I think it is fair that I also use it in my response. Likewise, if you decide to publish your personal opinions in a public forum such as the internet, then be willing to take criticism. Believe it or not my reviews are subjective not objective.
Oh, I'll get rid of the updates page too while i'm at it. Ooooh, Amy-pet gets mad when someone agrees with her! Luvvy, you really shouldn't get so pissy about little things. Getting rid fo the updates page would be cool, though. It's not like I, Aianmausu, go into any updates page-- even on sites I'm not reviewing. I really couldn't care less what's been updated recently.

...Now, Michiru tells me that a download/open box appears on the screen when you enter the site. As far as I know I didn't put anything on my site like a comet cursor so I don't think that it possible. dumbass. If it happened to her, it's possible. I also don't like .jpg files because they look very distorted because of the compression. I also cannot make .gif files because I do not have a proper image editing program. I have hard times too with webpages, so what. gif and jpg is really the only accepted image types. If you can't do that, you shouldn't be making a site. It's very basic. go to downloads.com & get one! And if I mispell one name it doesn't mean that I did it on purpose. The reason someone tells you a name is mispelled is so you can fix it. I also love it when you guys assume all these kinds of wild stuff like how I'm not that very "literate in terms" of this and that. It makes me wonder whether or not you should be reviewing me as a person or the Sailormoon site I
submitted to your review site to review. It's VERY hard to make a review interesting if all we mention is the technical aspects, or information or layout. I try to improve the site as well as the literary skills of the person who made it. No one asked me to, I didn't have to submit it. I also made opinions on the na dub in the special section based on the japanese version that i've heard of. If you want me to I'll say that on the page.

That is if I don't dump it like this review practically invites me to. Look, do whatever the hell you want. You asked for submissions for improvements, you don't have to listen to them. I don't see ANYWHERE, that we said to ditch the page. You asked for a review, we gave a review, told you what we liked and didn't like of your page. It was exactly the same as what we do for every page.

And I'm sorry if I don't update a lot. It's been a long while before I've gotten new Sailormoon episodes since it was the Christmas season, and you know how they always play christmas shows and all. I asked you to review on what the site has not what it should have and what it should be. Improvements means what it could be. How are we supposed to say "if you do this it'll be better" if we can't talk about what a site could be? >.<
On this note, all us reviewers do is pop over to I Review, check the review status for the link, and then review. We don't know if someone wants us to do something specifically. Reviews do what reviewers do, try to make things better. If we sound rude... so what? Maybe we're in a bad mood. You obviously were when you wrote this, and we're human too. You're taking suggestions to far. I also chose to use Pagebuilder, deal with it. How many times have I mentioned that IR is made with a pagebuilder? Do I care?

...After all the complaining I've done about that last bits of my review, I think it's safe to say that Mina's review was the most to-the-point and non-demanding part. That would be Aino, not Mina. Get to know your reviewers! She accepts that I can't do anything about the Geocities Ad box, you could move gives me the few suggestions that I wanted, what would be the point of a review that only tells you what you want to hear? Luvvy, you don't go to a reviewer with what you "wanted" in mind. You're most likely not to get that. S'why we get flames, like this luverly one. luvvy? *laughs*adds a couple of good things about my site, and wishes me luck. A special thanks to you Mina for showing the rest of the reviewers how it should be done. Thanks. There is no one set way of what to include in a review. we all do it differently. It would be stupid if all our reviews were just like Aino's.

By the way, if you would like to re-review my site when it is all finished to "YOUR STANDARDS" e-mail me back. we never asked to review your site. and we don't "want" to review your site. if you ask us, we'll do it. second, there is no point in reviewing a site that mets our standards, because then we couldn't offer help hints and such. That's why I have trouble reviewing sites I like, it's kinda pointless. I'd be happy to be trampled again.
That was sarcasm, right? And as I'm sure you have some sort of message saying that your reviews are part of your comments and that your not trying to offend anyone on your site, we don't TRY to offend people, it just happens anyway. I think you may have to modify that note to better fit the way you review. ?? it does fit the way we review. eh? Obviously, you should rename your wpr to say "I HATE REVIEWING, AND YOUR SITE IS NOT WORTHY OF US". or something else. I really don't understand people who've accused me of not enjoying reviewing. I love reviewing. I just don't like your site. And I'm pretty sure there's a grammar mistake or two in that as well right? yeah, not everyone can be as perfect as we are. *rolls eyes* Was that supposed to burn? *shakes her head* Amy, amy, amy, you really need to work on your burns.
Kao got this after she sent a response:
I do understand that you may have thought it was a flame, it was not. It you can't take criticism to your criticising reviews then you shouldn't be reviewing at all. I love the fact we are able to admit that at times our reviews can be harsh (the truth hurts), yet she cannot admit she wrote a flame when she is insulting us without support.

*    *    *

sunshine17@tellmeimcute.com
So you review sites at random huh? What if someone doesnt want their site reviewed...especially by you guys. Im part of a reviewing website, and we review for for fun. You know, just give tid bits of help. Your reviewing methods are pathetic. Why dont you guys lighten up a bit? Instead of being all bitchy and what not, try and actually be nice with people and help them out, instead of ripping their website to shreds.

OH MY GOD!! A FLAME! -_- so not in the mood.
1. we don't review sites at random. we have a submit form. people ASK us to review them.
2. a review is an opinion writen down. if you don't want someone to form an opinion on your site, don't make it available to the public.
3. We review for fun also. i have great fun reviewing site. i'm certain my team does as well, otherwise they would quit.
4. what is the point of giving 'tidbits' of help when we can give a whole pageful? useful, not pathetic.
5. our methods are the way they are because each site is unique and cannot be shoved into little categories or given a percentage. this is unfair to the webmaster's effort and looks to me as if the reviewer is lazy.
6. we can be lighthearted when the situation calls for it. we are also review according to personality and mood of that day. *shrugs* wouldn't it be boring if all WPRs were the same sugarcoated happy dummies?
7. if a site is ripped to shreds, it probably deserves it.
8. the fact that you did not name/URL your WPR tells me you are coward.
comments always appreciated,
Fisheye.

*    *    *

isreviews@hotmail.com
We, Inner Senshi Reviews, that's original. how many senshi review teams are there? (that are now dead) are a brand new Sailormoon review site and we are requesting your permission to be added to your WPR list. This is what bothered me. This person did not take the time to check if I Review even has a list. which we don't. We of course update about 4x a month. of course. If we do not update at all in a months time there is a simple explanation for that. this was included because of the AQ's thing that if a site doesnt update in a month it goes on the inactive list. I don't like that they assume that all WPRs play by the AQ's rules. Yahoo! Geocities (our webspace provider) sometimes does little changes in the tools we use to build or update the site. There are sometimes minor as well as major delays that we cannot help. This does not mean that we are not legit. Thank you for your cooperation.
-Inner Senshi Reviews
P.S.
If you are wondering we will place a link to your Review site on our site (of course!) ^^ cheerful, happy, oh what a polite young lady. my response was this: it would help if i had
a) your URL
b) your link button
c) a WRP list! it annoys me that you didn't even bother to see if I Review has one. I received this soon after:
Glad I didn't give you my URL! And I am annoyed because EVERY WPR should have it's own WPR list! What kind of review site are you??? oh yeah, i'm dying to check out these guys now. why should all WPRs have a list? because the AQ and W4 have one? well, see, the reason I Review doesn't have one is just for that reason. the other WPR sites have a list, i don't need to waste space and time making one. I Review has been around for six months. Looking at the WPR survivial rate, I'd say we're a damn good one. I can't remember much of my response except for this: an original one. don't tell me what to do with my own site.
Okay, now here's the part where I become a smartass...
I do believe there is no part in that last e-mail message that I said "PUT A WPR LIST ON YOUR SITE NOW" so I do believe I'm not telling you what to do with your site. look up. see where it says 'every WPR should have a list'? right there is where you say it. since i have a wpr, by your statement you are telling me i should have a list. i can't wait to learn logical reasoning so this is as obvious to you as it is to me.
If you would have just sent me an e-mail reply from the first message saying that you didn't have an WPR list that would've been fine but no I had to catch you when you were on PMS! why do people assume that because i am don't respond to bothersome people politely that i am 'on PMS'? now, look up again. see my responce, c? I did tell you I don't have a list. Tough luck for me I guess! sorry, i must have left my silver plater in the cupboard.
Oh, and don't bother e-mailing me back because I'm blocking your address! Sorry! i'm so hurt.
P.S. Fuck you whore!
ah, now is this really a person you want reviewing your site? that's Inner Senshi Review, I'd post the URL but this person was too stupid to give it to me when asking to be linked on a non-existant WPR list.

*    *    *

I am one of the makers of a site you reviewed, called Crescent Moons, Pink Hearts and Blue Bubbles. We changed what you pointed out, so how come you complain about those changes? Cause that's what I do around here! Birds fly, dogs bark, Fishuu complains.
I say that Rini is Rini Shields because that is what i've seen on every freaking site i've been to, so just TELL ME what the hell YOU think her name is. I looked over my review, wondered what the hell i was talking about (as it had been a while since the review when I received this flame) and concluded this: Rini was born during the thirtieth century. At that time, her parents are royalty. Darien is no longer Darien but King Endymion. I would think he would have disgarded his last name with his first. Therefore, Rini does not have a last name when she is born. Either that or I was on crack at the time. Whichever.
you obviously don't check our site much, because we have been working on it. What, I'm supposed to check on you every week to see what's new? your site is not worth my time.
I haven't seen any empty pages, and i check alot. then make more pages! there ARE fanfics posted, so go look at them! At the time of the review, there were no fanfictions up. Reviews are static, I don't go back and change then should the site change.
also, all you said was "she blahblahblah..." well, which she??? Huh? I looked over both my reviews and I did not see any "she blahblahblah"
it gets very difficult to fix things if you don't specify WHO you're talking about, because there ARE three of us. How the hell am I supposed to know that? no where, at the time, did it specify that three people were responsible for that site.
also, why didn't you e-mail one of us before you posted anything at all? I post reviews when they are complete, then I email the owner. the message is always the same, "you have been reviewed" and our address. What did you expect? "is this review to your liking? did you want us to change our opinions, o mistresses?" No.
THAT is not very good, or 'professional'. I am a professional, therefore what I do is professional. Every review team has it's own method.
yes, we are just a few thirteen-year-olds who made a site, but you would be surprised at just how far it has come since we first started it more than a year ago. I don't care. Thirteen year olds can make much better sites than mine, and 30 year olds can make much worse. Your age, your sites' history, is not an excuse for the condition of your site at the time of its review.
i'll let you know when we think you MIGHT like it, so don't bother doing another re-review unless you tell us first,  Oh, so I am supposed to ask your permission to review you? bah. I don't think anyone has noticed, but I have gone out and picked random sites to review, without the webmaster even knowing, let alone giving 'permission'
and unless it's a bit nicer. If you want sugar-coated reviews stay the hell away from I Review. I really don't understand this, webmasters can read our reviews and get to know our style, but instead they chose to submit without knowing how we review, and then complain when they don't get what they really want, which is a n ego-boost! If you want to be reviewed, you must be able to take constructive criticism, which is exactly what this is. sheesh.
Rini love, Fishuu